Patient Performed Reading of a Phototest - A Reliable Method?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-7229.2012.01.01.12Keywords:
Phototesting, Ultraviolet radiation, Self-assessment, Test reliability, Skin cancer, Prevention, Risk classification, Skin type, UV-sensitivity, Skin MalignanciesAbstract
In various situations, in clinical practice or for prevention purposes directed at skin cancer, a broadened use of phototesting to estimate individual skin UV-sensitivity may be warranted. The aim of the present study was to investigate, in a primary health care population, the reliability of patient performed reading of a UVB phototest, when compared to the reading of a trained physician. Thirty-two subjects, all patients recruited in a primary health care population, underwent a UVB phototest, applied on the forearm. Test reading was performed after 24 hours, by the subjects themselves, by counting the number of erythemal reactions (0-6) detectable, and immediately after this, an independent control reading performed by a doctor was also done. The results showed a 72% absolute agreement between the subjects' readings and the control readings, and with a weighted kappa-value of 0.78 (95 CI: 0.64 - 0.91), i.e. corresponding to "substantial agreement". In conclusion, patient performed self-reading of a UVB phototest appears to be a fairly reliable method for estimation of individual skin UV-sensitivity, when compared to the reading of a trained observer. The finding opens up for a broadened use of phototesting in clinical practice and for preventive initiatives aiming at identifying at-risk individuals and reducing sun exposure.
References
Diffey BL, Farr PM. Quantitative aspects of ultraviolet erythema. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 1991; 12: 311-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0815/12/4/001
Lock-Andersen J, Wulf HC. Threshold level for measurement of UV sensitivity: reproducibility of phototest. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1996; 12: 154-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0781.1996.tb00192.x
Falk M, Anderson C. Prevention of skin cancer in primary healthcare: an evaluation of three different prevention effort levels and the applicability of a phototest. Eur J Gen Pract 2008; 14: 68-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814780802423430
Falk M, Magnusson H. Sun protection advice mediated by the general practitioner: An effective way to achieve long-term change of behaviour and attitudes related to sun exposure? Scand J Prim Health Care 2011; 29: 135-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2011.580088
Boni, R, Schuster C, Nehrhoff B, Burg G. Epidemiology of skin cancer. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2002; 23(Suppl 2): 48-51.
Diepgen TL, Mahler V. The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 2002; 146(Suppl 61): 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.146.s61.2.x
Geller AC, Annas GD. Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 2003; 19: 2-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/sonu.2003.50000
Leiter U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer--the role of sunlight. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008; 624: 89-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_8
Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124: 869-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060015008
Boldeman C, Dal H, Kristjansson S, Lindelöf B. Is self-assessment of skin type a valid method for adolescents? J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50: 447-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2003.08.009
Rampen FH, Fleuren BA, deBoo TM, Lemmens WA. Unreliability of self-reported burning tendency and tanning ability. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124: 885-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1988.01670060031011
Falk M. Differences in sun exposure habits between self-reported skin type and ultraviolet sensitivity measured by phototest. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2011; 27: 190-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0781.2011.00599.x
Falk M, Anderson C. Reliability of self-assessed reading of skin tests: a possible approach in research and clinical practice? Dermatol Online J 2010; 16: 4.
Howard TP, Solomon DA. Reading the tuberculin skin test. Who, when, and how? Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 2457-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1988.00380110093020
Gourevitch MN, et al. Self-assessment of tuberculin skin test reactions by drug users with or at risk for human immunodeficiency virus infection. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 1999; 3: 321-5.
Ozuah PO, Burton W, Lerro KA, Rosenstock J, Mulvihill M. Assessing the validity of tuberculin skin test readings by trained professionals and patients. Chest 1999; 116: 104-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.116.1.104
Selby CD, Allen MB, Leitch AG. How well do the general public read Heaf skin tests? Respir Med 1990; 84: 245-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0954-6111(08)80043-1
Prezant DJ, et al. Self-assessment of tuberculin skin test reactions by New York City firefighters: reliability and cost-effectiveness in an occupational health care setting. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 280-3.
Navin JA, Kaplan JE, Desilvio EL. Self-reading of PPD skin tests. J Am Coll Health 1994. 43: 37-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07448481.1994.9939083
Huerta, M, Balicer RD, Mimouni D, et al. Validity of self-assessment of skin reaction after smallpox vaccination. Public Health Rep 2006; 121: 45-50.
Josefson A., Svensson, A, Färm G, Engfeldt M, Meding B. Validation of Self-testing as a Method to Estimate the Prevalence of Nickel Allergy. Acta Derm Venereol 2011; 91: 526-30.
Carlsson A, Gånemo A, Anderson CD, Meding B, Stenberg B, Svensson A. Scoring of hand eczema: good agreement between patients and dermatological staff. Br J Dermatol 2011; 165: 123-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10312.x
Kulp JL, Chaudhry S, Wiita B, Bachmann G. The accuracy of women performing vaginal pH self-testing. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2008; 17: 523-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2007.0446
Ferris DG, Francis SL, Dickman ED, Miler-Miles K, Waller JL, McClendon N. Variability of vaginal pH determination by patients and clinicians. J Am Board Fam Med 2006; 19: 368-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.4.368
Shaw J, Kerry S, Adjei-Gyamfi Y, et al. Are stroke patients' reports of home blood pressure readings reliable? Cross-sectional study. Fam Pract 2011; 28: 118-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmq087
Hamilton W, Round A, Goodchild R, Baker C. Do community based self-reading sphygmomanometers improve detection of hypertension? A feasibility study. J Public Health Med 2003; 25: 125-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg027
Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 1992; 304: 1491-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491
Harrison SL, Buttner PG. Do all fair-skinned Caucasians consider themselves fair? Prev Med 1999; 29: 349-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1999.0555
Ilias MA, Falk M, Wårdell K, Anderson C. Phototesting based on a divergent beam--a study on normal subjects. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2001; 17: 189-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0781.2001.170409.x
Farr PM, Besag JE, Diffey BL. The time course of UVB and UVC erythema. J Invest Dermatol 1988; 91: 454-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12476577
Leslie KS, Lodge E, Garioch JJ. A comparison of narrowband (TL-01) UVB-induced erythemal response at different body sites. Clin Exp Dermatol 2005; 30: 337-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01845.x
Roelandts R. The diagnosis of photosensitivity. Arch Dermatol 2000; 136: 1152-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archderm.136.9.1152
Kim JJ, Lim HW. Evaluation of the photosensitive patient. Semin Cutan Med Surg 1999; 18: 253-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1085-5629(99)80024-8
Bylaite M, Grigaitiene J, Lapinskaite GS. Photodermatoses: classification, evaluation and management. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161 Suppl 3: 61-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09451.x
Gordon PM, Saunders PJ, Diffey BL, Farr PM. Phototesting prior to narrowband (TL-01) ultraviolet B phototherapy. Br J Dermatol 1998; 139: 811-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02505.x
Falk M, Ilias M, Anderson C. Inter-observer variability in reading of phototest reactions with sharply or diffusely delineated borders. Skin Res Technol 2008; 14: 397-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00305.x
Svedberg P. Attitudes to health promotion interventions among patients in mental health services--differences in relation to socio-demographic, clinical and health-related variables. J Ment Health 2011; 20: 126-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2010.507684
Santmyire BR, Feldman SR, Fleischer Jr AB. Lifestyle high-risk behaviors and demographics may predict the level of participation in sun-protection behaviors and skin cancer primary prevention in the United States: results of the 1998 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2001; 92: 1315-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1315::AID-CNCR1453>3.0.CO;2-I
Branstrom R, Kasparian NA, Chang YM, et al. Predictors of sun protection behaviors and severe sunburn in an international online study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010; 19: 2199-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0196
Kasparian NA, McLoone JK, Meiser B. Skin cancer-related prevention and screening behaviors: a review of the literature. J Behav Med 2009; 32: 406-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-009-9219-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Similar Articles
- D.A. Tzerkovsky, A.N. Mazurenko, F.F. Borychevsky, D.V. Shashkouski, Radiodynamic Therapy with Photosensitizers: Mini-Review of Experimental and Clinical Studies , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 11 (2022)
- Arun Chairmadurai, Harish Chandra Goel, Sandeep Jain, Aklank Jain, Hridayesh Prakash, Ra-SBRT is Potential Immune Adjuvant for Innate Immune Cell Populations in Advance Stage NSCLC Patients , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 8 (2019)
- Michael J. González, Jorge R. Miranda-Massari, Michael Joseph Gonzalez, Jose Olalde, Miguel J. Berdiel, Liza Cardona, New Insights on Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Cancer , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 13 (2024)
- Cuihong Song, Jie Liao, Zihui Deng, Jinying Zhang, Hui Xue, Yongming Li, Chen Liang, Ming Han, Jianhua Li, Guangtao Yan, Correlations between Carcinoembryonic Antigen, Epidermal Growth Factor and Leptin in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2014)
- Yanyun Xie, Anil Kapoor, Hao Peng, Jean-Claude Cutz, Lijian Tao , Damu Tang , IQGAP2 Displays Tumor Suppression Functions , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015)
- Simona Di Francesco, Raffaele L. Tenaglia, Metabolic Alterations, Vascular Disease and Advanced Prostate Cancer: New Players for Metastatic Advanced Prostate Cancer? , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2014)
- Tatiana Levkovich, Theofilos Poutahidis, Kelsey Cappelle, Mark B. Smith, Allison Perrotta, Eric J. Alm , Susan E. Erdman , ‘Hygienic’ Lymphocytes Convey Increased Cancer Risk , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 3 No. 3 (2014)
- Jamie Ritchey, Wilfried Karmaus, Tara Sabo-Attwood, Susan E. Steck, Hongmei Zhang, A Review of the Expression of Genes Involved in Sex Steroid Hormone Metabolism in Prostate Tissue: A Need for Epigenetic Information , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 2 No. 3 (2013)
- Megha Jain, Vipin Jain, Anish Gupta, Swati Saawarn, Samar Khan, Role of Hormones in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - An Update , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 6 No. 4 (2017)
- Shu Yuasa, Ryuichi Furuta, Megumi Kabeya, Yuko Shirokawa, Satoshi Hibi, Seiji Nagao, Shozo Togawa, Satoshi Kayukawa, Kenji Ina, The Relief of Nociceptive Pain Induced by Panitumumab Could be Sustainable during Chemotherapy , Journal of Analytical Oncology: Vol. 13 (2024)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.