logo

Landscape of Targetable Genetic Alterations in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma among Patients in Southeast Asia

Authors
  • Bhavisha Patel

    Sumandeep Nursing College, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Vadodara, Gujarat, India
  • Balasankar Karavadi

    Department of Bioinformatics, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Ravindrasinh M. Rajput

    Faculty of Allied and Healthcare, Gokul Global University, Sidhpur, Gujarat, India
  • Shivangi Gupta

    Quantum University Research Center, Quantum University, Roorkee, Uttarakhand, 247667, India
  • Rajashree Panigrahi

    Department of Microbiology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
  • P. Ravishankar

    Department of General Surgery, Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Medical College & Hospitals Vinayaka Mission’s Research Foundation (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Saksham Sood

    Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India
  • Honganur Raju Manjunath

    Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Keywords:
Cholangiocarcinoma, Targetable Genetic Alterations, Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), Precision Oncology, FGFR2 Fusion, IDH1/IDH2 Mutations, Southeast Asia
Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a heterogeneous form of biliary tract cancer, for which treatment options remain limited; however, molecular profiling technology has helped in uncovering genomic mutations that can be used in precision oncology. This molecular profiling study has been carried out retrospectively in order to investigate the genomic alterations that are targetable in advanced cholangiocarcinomas of Southeast Asia. Samples from 126 patients were analyzed through targeted next generation sequencing in order to identify somatic mutations, copy number alterations, and gene fusions. Identified genomic alterations were characterized based on their clinical relevance and relation with biomarker-based treatment. A potentially actionable genomic alteration was observed in 93 patients (73.8%), while 28 patients (22.2%) had multiple genomic alterations. The commonest observed alterations consisted of mutations in TP53 (19.0%), fusion events of FGFR2 (16.7%), mutations in IDH1 (14.3%), mutations in KRAS (13.5%), and amplifications of ERBB2 (7.1%). This indicates the presence of considerable molecular diversity among patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma and the existence of genomic subtypes that have clinical relevance in the Southeast Asian population. The detection of actionable genomic alterations among patients provides clear evidence on the need for genomic profiling as a strategy for molecular characterization and testing of biomarkers. Prospective multicentre studies will be necessary to confirm the results.

Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References

[1] Khosla D, Misra S, Chu PL, Guan P, Nada R, Gupta R, Hong JH. Cholangiocarcinoma: recent advances in molecular pathobiology and therapeutic approaches. Cancers 2024; 16(4): 801.

[2] Casadio M, Biancaniello F, Overi D, Venere R, Carpino G, Gaudio E, Cardinale V. Molecular landscape and therapeutic strategies in cholangiocarcinoma: an integrated translational approach towards precision medicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2021; 22(11): 5613.

[3] Chiu P, Limoges J, Puddester R, Gretchev A, Carlsson L, Leslie K, Pike A. Developing policy infrastructure to guide genomics-informed oncology nursing in Canada: An interpretive descriptive study. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research 2024; 56(4): 363-376.

[4] Oura K, Morishita A, Nakahara M, Tadokoro T, Fujita K, Tani J, Kobara H. Chronic liver disease-associated cholangiocarcinoma: genomic insights and precision therapeutic strategies. Cancers 2025; 17(18): 3052.

[5] Tavolari S, Brandi G. Mutational landscape of cholangiocarcinoma according to different etiologies: a review. Cells 2023; 12(9): 1216.

[6] Cigliano A, Chen X, Calvisi DF. Current challenges to underpinning the genetic basis for cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Review of Gastroenterology Hepatology 2021; 15(5): 511-526.

[7] Qu Z, Lau CW, Nguyen QV, Zhou Y, Catchpoole DR. Visual analytics of genomic and cancer data: a systematic review. Cancer Informatics 2019; 18: 1176935119835546.

[8] Jaidee R, Jusakul A, Pocasap P, Kukongviriyapan V, Senggunprai L, Prawan A, Kongpetch S. Establishment and genomic profiling of cholangiocarcinoma cells with functional characterization. Scientific Reports 2025; 15(1): 8621.

[9] Busisiwe N, Seeley J, Strode A, Parker M. Beyond translations, perspectives for researchers to consider to enhance comprehension during consent processes for health research in sub-saharan Africa: a scoping review. BMC Medical Ethics 2023; 24(1): 43.

[10] Choudhury S, Maiti A, Bandopadhyay A, Tripathi A, Sikdar N. Global gene expression landscape of gallbladder cancer and advances in targeted therapeutic strategies. World Journal of Clinical Oncology 2025; 16(10): 111028.

[11] Warner JL, Jain SK, Levy MA. Integrating cancer genomic data into electronic health records. Genome Medicine 2016; 8(1): 113.

[12] Moris D, Palta M, Kim C, Allen PJ, Morse MA, Lidsky ME. Advances in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: an overview of the current and future therapeutic landscape for clinicians. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2023; 73(2): 198-222.

[13] Mahmood U, Abbass A, Khan K. Optimizing outcomes and personalizing care with targeted agents in advanced cholang-iocarcinoma. Cancer Treatment Reviews 2024; 131: 102851.

[14] Macarulla T, Neuzillet C, Prager GW, Rimassa L, Bridgewater J. Opportunities and Approaches to Optimising Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma Outcomes in the Era of Targeted Therapies: A Narrative Review. Oncology and Therapy 2025; 13(4): 939-962.

[15] Brody JA, Morrison AC, Bis JC, O'Connell JR, Brown MR, Huffman JE, Cupples LA. Analysis commons, a team approach to discovery in a big-data environment for genetic epidemiology. Nature Genetics 2017; 49(11): 1560-1563.

[16] Cortiana V, Chorya H, Joshi M, Kannan S, Mahendru D, Vallabhaneni H, Park CH. Cholangiocarcinoma Insights: Established Foundations and Cutting-Edge Innovations from Dr. James Cleary’s Pioneering Research. Cancers 2024; 16(3): 632.

[17] Rimassa L, Khan S, Koerkamp BG, Roessler S, Andersen JB, Raggi C, Macias RI. Mapping the landscape of biliary tract cancer in Europe: challenges and controversies. The Lancet Regional Health–Europe 2025; 50.

[18] Kuipers H, de Bitter TJ, de Boer MT, van der Post RS, Nijkamp MW, de Reuver PR, Hoogwater FJ. Gallbladder cancer: current insights in genetic alterations and their possible therapeutic implications. Cancers 2021; 13(21): 5257.

[19] Thamlikitkul L, Parinyanitikul N, Sriuranpong V. Genomic medicine and cancer clinical trial in Thailand. Cancer Biology Medicine 2023; 21(1): 10.

[20] Hong JH, Yong CH, Heng HL, Chan JY, Lau MC, Chen J, Teh BT. Integrative multiomics enhancer activity profiling identifies therapeutic vulnerabilities in cholangiocarcinoma of different etiologies. Gut 2024; 73(6): 966-984.

Downloads
Published
30-09-2026
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Landscape of Targetable Genetic Alterations in Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma among Patients in Southeast Asia. (2026). Journal of Cancer Research Updates, 15(3), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.30683/1929-2279.2026.15.27

Similar Articles

31-40 of 127

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.